Campesino.com
20 - 24 September, Ian & a return to a
previous question
In at least one of the Morocco entries I
questioned whether there is a distinctive quality to being, say, Moroccan or
whether we aren't just all simply incomplete Americans. The same set of
questions has been on my mind here recently, and for many of the same reasons.
One thing I can say with more confidence now is that different places are
really
different. Occasionally these differences can
be boiled down, as they are in The Economist's
World in
Figures book, to statistical facts, which may
not have the stark simplicity that the typography implies but are nonetheless
carrying some kinds of important truth. Some statistics seem pretty easy to
establish: for example eight of the world's ten highest mountains are (at least
partly) in Nepal. Other statistics are clearly questionable: for example, the
country with ostensibly the highest per capita rates of both serious assault and
theft is Australia, but this is complicated by the varying definitions of
crimes, willingness to report and police admin efficiency throughout the world.
In between these extremes of clarity lie most of the interesting statistics.
The 15 countries with the lowest life expectancy are all in Africa. Eight of
the ten countries with the highest percentage of 15 year old males who watch
more than four hours of TV per day in the week are in the former Soviet Union.
(The top spot goes to the Ukraine, and the USA and Israel make up the other top
ten places.) The six countries with the most male populations are all found on
the Arabian peninsula, led by the United Arab Emirates with an astounding 190
males per 100 females.These are the
lucky nuggets of information that can be expressed in relative empirical
measures. But if you travel with your eyes open you don't need mathematics to
see how peoples' lives vary by
geography.On Thursday Michelle took
the girls and me on an errand to the local school in Chugchilan for children
from the age of 6 and upwards. While there are children who didn't start school
until later than normal and remain there until they are as old as 16, most of
the kids move to the next school up at age 12 or 13. School attendance has only
recently become compulsory in Ecuador up to age 9. The school day at the school
we visited runs from 7:30 to 12:30 with a 30 minute break. The early start is
especially severe for those children who have to walk 2.5 to 3 hours to get
there. There are 285 students and 7 teachers so class sizes range from 30 to
50. The state provides only the buildings and the teachers' salaries, leaving
parents to pay not only for uniforms but also for books and other
materials.We caught the kids on their
break, when they were variously running around the playground, playing soccer
and eating chocolate-covered bananas or sugary snacks. The kids are tiny: a
nine year old boy was dwarfed by Zoe and Heidi who sandwich him in age; the
children whom we'd assumed were about three are at all least
six.There is, though, nothing remotely
backwards about the material that they're expected to learn. The syllabuses for
all subjects are compiled into a single book for each year group, which not only
makes a very sensible economy but also forms a satisfying embodiment of the
corpus of required knowledge. We browsed and borrowed the books for Heidi's
age, Zoe's age and for the older children. I have the Key Stage Two maths
syllabus with me from home and the Ecuadorian equivalent is at least as
advanced. The elder children, most of whom seem destined to spend their adult
days drying corn in the sun and beating seeds from lupin pods with sticks, are
taught to be able to extract the square roots of large numbers (e.g. 447,890)
that are not exact squares - without a calculator, if you try to do it
yourself!The non-mathematics subjects,
from what I can gather reading through the illustrated Spanish, have an
admirable treatment of scientific and socio-political topics encountered in
everyday life. In a nation whose people are in direct contact with the land for
subsistence, some of whose regions we are advised by our government not to visit
for fear of volcanic activity and that has relatively recently been at war with
its neighbours, contexts for this present themselves perhaps more naturally than
they do at home.In these rural
communities, unlike in the towns, there is no local capability to teach the
luxuries of English or computing, although Michelle does a little of the latter
with the older children.One topic
common to England and Ecuador is nutrition, which everyone reports to be
atrocious here, with most of the locals apparently unaware that vegetables
should be expected to supplement a diet predominantly formed of starch. (This
is one of the many reasons why the Black Sheep Inn is so venerated by travellers
- the meals are healthy, varied, filling and tasty.)
Speaking to the issue that at home,
amidst the emerging post-Thatcher consensus on educational values, still most
separates the muesli-belt metro-socialists and the repressed and repressing
Right, children here entering their teenage years are expected to know not only
the raw "facts of life" in their aspirational setting of conservative family
values but are also taught about homosexuality, transexuality, rape,
paedophilia, transvestism and sado-masochism. It's my impression that the
church has far less popular influence in Ecuador than it does in other South
American countries and that Christian values are idly observed, if at all.
Michelle estimates that about 35-40% of couples with children here are unmarried
and that there is in addition to this a very high incidence of mothers bringing
up children without a father.A good
illustration of the low-impact way in which the people around here have
integrated Christianity into their lives is provided by La Mama Negra festival
that we saw in Latacunga yesterday. This runs for these four days, when it's
primarily targeted at the locals who have finished all of the year's reaping and
sowing and are in town for the market. It's re-run in November when there are
more gringos kicking around. Even without the festival, the journey to
Latacunga would have been worthwhile. We travelled with a new volunteer at the
BSI called Jason, whose chattiness and Spanish were both very welcome, and our
driver, who had the great Odysseyan name of Nestor (we should have had this name
down on our list in case we'd had a boy). The journey took us along the rough
road to Quilotoa (from where Paula and I have now both twice walked to the Black
Sheep Inn), then to Zumbahua (whose market we visited earlier this month) and
then by tarmac road over to Latacunga. After leaving Zumbahau the road rises to
4,000m and everywhere the
campesinos
can be seen dressed traditionally and driving cattle or working the fields.
Yesterday many of them had llamas; on the way back one tiny boy tried to ride
his llama, only to be thrown off.In
Latacunga we went first to Nestor's house, which was compact, clean and
comfortable and decorated in what we might see as a frilly 1970's kitsch. We
picked up Nestor's wife, Mercedes, and drove to a spot convenient for the
festivities. En route we passed through a police line, which Mercedes and
Nestor seemed to tell the young officers they had no intention of respecting.
We joined the festival in a square overlooking the town. Numerous groups of
(mainly) youths in brightly-coloured clothes congregated in the square and
several of the parties featured men carrying butchered pigs pegged to towers and
gaily decorated with vodka bottles and cigarettes. Many of the men were dressed
in various types of mask; others wore bright ponchos and most of the girls wore
equally vivid wide skirts that bellowed out impressively as they danced. There
were also at least half a dozen bands similar to the one Zoe and I saw at the
weekend in Chugchilan. The accounts of South American festivals that I'd read
beforehand all seem to feature people of outstanding grace and beauty; this one
didn't, but since everyone was good-natured and enthusiastic it didn't
matter.Once most of the groups had
convened on the square an obscure ritual took place in which several of the
participants led by a masked man theatrically wielding a large chequered flag
made repeating presentations to a group of men dressed in period military
costume at the foot of a tower topped by a huge Madonna. Amongst all of this
circled the Mama Negra figures (there were at least three), sometimes on foot
and sometimes on horseback. I'm told that these are in some way related to the
Virgin but you'd struggle to see how: they are guys dressed up as women with
black face masks who squirt the crowd with cologne-perfumed milk dispensed from
a rubber bulb.
After this initial part of the
festival we had lunch at one of the small stands that carve meat and crackling
from whole roast pigs and serve it up with orange mashed potato, corn and
lettuce. Washed down with the local beer it was actually
delicious.After lunch Mercedes and
Nestor, who knew absolutely everyone, led us ahead of the parade to a spot on a
street corner from where we could watch all of the groups and bands dance past.
Every so often a figure would come up to us, usually in costume, and press a
shot of cane sugar alcohol upon us. I only had three or four shots - to see out
of curiosity whether the orange, green and purple shots had different flavours
(they don't) - but Jason had twice as many and Mercedes and Nestor accepted
every one offered, which must have been a dozen. As they downed more and more
our jokes about Nestor's fitness to drive us home assumed less levity. Nestor's
solution was simple: he munched on roasted corn bites that the cane rum donors
provided and that he claimed would hide the smell of alcohol on his breath if he
were stopped by the police. The chances of him being stopped by the police,
though, were slim: not only did he apparently know them all and enjoy a sort of
paternal leverage, they were drinking the shots
too.When the parade wound up we went
into town for a couple of hours, thinking that we could do some chores while
Nestor might hopefully enjoy a restorative nap. Our first errand was to get
some cash from an ATM, which is neither possible nor especially necessary in the
environs of Chugchilan. The national currency in Ecuador is now the US Dollar.
They abolished their own currency in 2000, when for six months all domestic
currency savings accounts were frozen without warning, during which time the
currency, and thus the funds, devalued by some huge amount (~50%). Michelle
says that this episode wiped out the middle classes in Ecuador, leaving a bigger
divide between the rich (who had enough resources and/or offshore accounts to
weather the transition) and the poor. Since then, despite political instability
(according to Nestor and others no President has remained in office for more
than two years) the adoption of the dollar has been beneficial for those that
have many of them - inflation, which averaged 38% between 1998 and 2003 is now
down to 8%.After the ATM run we went
to an internet cafe and had a short but useful burst of mail catch-up, with a
fast link that didn't sporadically disconnect. (BTW, any idea why anyone still
uses, as all internet cafes seem to, Internet Explorer instead of Firefox, which
is nicer, more secure and doesn't keep pushing unwanted pop-ups at
you?)While we were hanging around in
the central square for Nestor we noticed that quite a few of the townies were
wearing Western-style dress, which we don't see in the
hills.The drive back was as enjoyable
as the drive to Latacunga. From the higher land we had clear views over to the
snow-topped Cotopaxi volcano, which peaks at just under 6,000m. The
campesinos
were still everywhere very much in evidence with their llamas, cows, goats and
pigs, and many of them seemed to be doing their laundry - this being another
activity, like dog-training, arable farming and cattle herding that is
accomplished through the beating of a stick. Many of the boys and men were
playing volleyball on courts improvised on rectangles of flat land; this, rather
than soccer, seems to be the demotic sport here. We escaped the violent burst
of thunder, rain and lightning that had swept over Chugchilan, and although
there were no signs of the downpour until we were close to the BSI, sections of
the narrow steep-sided track from Quilotoa had been further restricted by small
landslides, presumably the result of fierce
winds.As we drove back we quizzed
Nestor about the life of the locals, with Jason, excused after an hour or so of
swapping recitations of highlights from The Simpsons with Zoe and Heidi,
translating. As I've written before, the simple dwellings of the
campesinos,
built with adobe or cinder block, dot the fields all around here. It surprises
me that they are all served with mains water, which they are, let alone
electricity, which is now provided to them all, cheaply, by a US utility.
Nestor confirmed what Michelle had told us, and which we can see for ourselves
through the open doors in the gloaming, that they all have TV. Apparently their
favourite shows are Springer-like studio audience confrontations and similarly
dramatic South American soaps. The TV's are evidence of a flourishing business
in sales through credit, which have generated huge profits for entrepreneurs who
load up on electrical goods in Quito then sell them off lorries to the poor
people of the Latacunga loop, who pay a daily rate for everything from
liquidizers to cars. The purchase of a car or lorry might not be as frivolous
as it seems as it could open up new markets for the sale of home-grown produce;
however the evidence of my own eyes unquestionably refutes Nestor's assertion,
at the height of his early evening rhetoric, that people here make such huge
investments.Moreover Michelle's
experience is unequivocal: the people here have no conception at all of the
rudiments of business, and it would be surprising if they had gathered such
notions from what is manifestly a peasant lifestyle. When Andres and Michelle
opened up here the locals met their proposal that people would pay to visit the
area with open scepticism; and as the venture succeeded their scepticism only
matured into blank incomprehension: they could not understand that the people
staying at the Black Sheep Inn were not relatives or friends. All the time
Andres and Michelle encouraged the locals to open up a hostal themselves, which
eventually, after 5 years of encouragement and commercial evidence, they did
(Mama Hilda's was the first, since joined by the Cloud Forest
Hostal).This takes us back to the
questions resuscitated at the start of this entry from my blogs in Fez regarding
the goals of these "developing" people. I now understand why it's hard to
understand: at the heart of the matter is a paradox. The locals, once they've
been presented with a vision of greater comfort and wealth, largely as a result
of being rendered into a market of one form or another by western commercial
interests, can no longer be satisfied with a hard life in an adobe hut. I
wouldn't if I were them, and nor would you. Now they want to live like
Americans live (GDP per head in Ecuador is $3,340; in the US it's over ten times
that at $36,110). But unlike the rare exceptional communities such as the
Galapagos Islanders, who have the compelling attraction of their outstanding
wildlife, the main asset that the
campesinos
have is the image of themselves that they can market back to people from the USA
and Europe who are disillusioned with precisely the values and lifestyle to
which the locals aspire. Pioneers like Michelle and Andres who come to places
like this for their own adventures and are in it but not of it can carve out a
space on between cultures that enables them to exploit the interchange of
symmetrical dissatisfaction of each with what it has and desire for the other.
A few others can follow suit. But the inevitable path is that to the extent
that the locals get the wealth that they want it will dilute their desirability
in the eyes of the westerners that bring it to them. It seems to me that this
will lead to increasing disillusionment on both
sides.The central question that could
unlock this is the one I mooted from Fez: what distinctive - non-American -
value does the local culture have that it might reasonably be able to retain as
it becomes richer? The answers may be easy to find if they are assets of
landscape, flora or fauna, in which case the questions resolve into matters of
conservation that you would hope would be amenable to practical solutions
(though even this may be unrealistic in countries lacking established civil
services experienced in dealing in such matters). The answers are harder if
they are cultural. The only compelling voices I can think of that articulate a
clear mission of hanging onto a native cultural identity come from Islam, and
they don't all present the best outcomes for those of us interested in a future
on this side of heaven.
Posted: Sun - September 25, 2005 at 02:56 AM
|
Quick Links
Links
Archives
XML/RSS Feed
Calendar
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
|
Categories
Comments powered by
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Feb 08, 2006 06:20 PM
|